Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Thank you for a great class!



I hope you enjoyed it as much as I did.

Look for your grades to be posted by 6 PM tonight (Tuesday the 28th).

Please keep in touch. And bon appétit!

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

Monday, July 20, 2009

Silicon Valley Residents Try Their Hand at Raising Backyard Chickens


By Dana Hull, San Jose Mercury News

07/20/2009 05:37:38 AM

Santa Clara Vice Mayor Jamie Matthews doesn't fancy himself as a trendy guy. He's 48, has four kids and his day job is working as a code enforcement administrator for the city of San Jose.

But Matthews has three chickens — hens, to be exact — in his backyard. And that puts him squarely in the middle of the latest fad for some intrepid urban and suburban gardeners: raising backyard chickens.

"It's a labor of love," said Matthews, who gives eggs to his neighbors and has named his three hens Star, Lucy and Ethel. "There's a tremendous difference in quality. The yolks of our eggs are larger and more vibrant than ones you buy at a grocery store, and they are very, very tasty. You don't need salt and pepper."

There's no California chicken census. Accurate statistics on how many chickens are pecking around Bay Area backyards are impossible to come by because many cities allow households to keep a small number of chickens without permits. In San Jose, you can keep six chickens or fewer without a permit; in Santa Clara, it's four or fewer.

But anecdotal information suggests many people are taking the poultry plunge. Seattle sponsors a popular City Chickens Coop Tour. There are blogs galore, with names like The Daily Coop, Urban Chicken Underground, and Now and Hen. And Redwood City resident Thomas Kriese twitters about it @urbanchickens.

In Palo Alto, 20 people have city chicken permits, which cost $15 and are renewed every year. Palo Alto allows a maximum of six hens per household but bans roosters because of noise. The city also requires that the hens be secured in a coop at night so they are safe from predators like raccoons. Neighbors, who in the past have lodged noise complaints, must also grant permission.

"Most of the chicken owners in Palo Alto are families with young kids," said Fran Law, the city's lead animal control officer. "They are into healthy eating. They give flax seeds to the chickens so they can get more Omega-3 fatty acids in the eggs.

"It's kind of a yuppie thing. Usually Dad gets recruited to build the coop," said Law, who keeps her own chicken flock at her house in Half Moon Bay. "The mom researches chickens to death and really raises them."

Redwood City residents Susan and Garrett Alley started talking seriously about chickens in November, when California voters passed Proposition 2, an animal rights law that requires farmers to provide livestock, including chickens, more room in their cages.

"When I started learning about how most chickens are raised, we realized we could raise our own and know exactly how they are treated," said Susan Alley. "We got them in January, and we got our first egg on Memorial Day."

Her two daughters — Millen, 9, and Leigh, 7 — have added cleaning out the bottom of the chicken coop to their list of chores and love retrieving freshly laid eggs. The three Barred Rock hens — Mohawk, Mathilda and Cheepers — are fast supplanting the cat as favorite pets. The first daughter up in the morning goes out to feed them.

"They eat a ton, mostly plants and bugs," Millen said. "But they also love popcorn."

San Carlos resident Jeff Nachmann, who has tomatoes and corn growing in his garden, is in the process of leaping to chickens. He got inspired this past spring, when his daughter, who was in kindergarten, talked excitedly about the baby chicks hatched in her classroom.

"We have friends in San Mateo who have chickens, and they are really fun to watch," said Nachmann, who built a coop from a design he found on the Internet. "They are not really pets, but they are entertaining."

Oakland author Novella Carpenter warns in her recently published memoir "Farm City: The Education of an Urban Farmer," that "chickens are the gateway animal for urban farming." Carpenter's book chronicles her relationships with a menagerie that started with chickens and quickly expanded to included turkeys, rabbits and eventually two pigs — all in urban Oakland.

The Alley family is already thinking about the next step.

"The next animal to get would be a goat," said Susan Alley. "It would be great to be able to get your own goat milk and make cheese."

Her husband reminded her that Redwood City doesn't allow goats.

"Bees. Maybe we could do bees," he said. "I've heard that bees are becoming as popular as chickens.

Sunday, July 19, 2009

Dessert of the Week: Caramel Croissant Pudding from Nigella Lawson

Week Six: Dessert Course


Blueberry Tarts with Meyer Lemon Cream from
Dessert First

Note: Three day weekNo class Thursday

M 7.20
Class: Writer’s Workshop, Presentations
Due: Research paper (first draft; bring three copies)

T 7.21
Class: Watch—Eat Drink Man Woman (1994)
FYI: Feel free to bring food for the class to share

W 7.22
Class: Course review, Evaluations
Due: Research Paper—Wednesday (Hard copy for comments and grade) OR Thursday by 5 PM(Emailed for grade only)
Catering: Group 6—Dessert Course

Friday, July 17, 2009

Oscar Mayer Wienermobile Crashes Into Wisconcin Home


Friday, July 17, 2009
MOUNT PLEASANT, Wis. (AP) --

One southern Wisconsin homeowner is probably not in love with the Oscar Mayer wiener. The famed hot dog's Wienermobile crashed Friday into the deck and garage of a home in Mount Pleasant, about 35 miles south of Milwaukee.

Police said the driver was trying to turn the Wienermobile around in the driveway and thought she was moving in reverse. But she instead went forward and hit the home. It sat in the driveway as if it were stuck in the garage Friday afternoon.

No one was home and no one was injured. No citations were immediately issued.

Both the home and vehicle suffered moderate damage, which Oscar Mayer spokeswoman Sydney Lindner says insurance will cover.

Police hadn't been able to speak to the homeowner as of early Friday evening.

Think You Have Food Allergies? Think Again.


The most commonly used tests can be inaccurate, leading some people to limit their diets needlessly.

By Emily Sohn, Los Angeles Times

July 17, 2009

Allergies were far from Christie Littauer's mind when she fed creamed spinach to her son Jack for the first time. The 6-month-old had already eaten peas and green beans. Why not try something more exciting?

"A few bites into it, he started wheezing," says Littauer, of Henderson, Nev. "He got bright red. Something was obviously wrong."

After a scary ambulance ride, Littauer later discovered that her little boy was allergic to dairy in the spinach, making him one of a growing number of people with known food allergies.

Follow-up tests pointed to a bunch of other allergies too, putting Jack in another large category: those who think (or whose parents think) they're allergic or intolerant to foods they can handle just fine.

For 2 1/2 years, Jack was shielded from a wide array of foods, until more accurate testing proved he could eat quite a few of them, including wheat and fish. That opened a menu of possibilities for Jack -- bread, pasta, even chicken nuggets.

With a glut of nonspecialist doctors now offering allergy testing to patients, results that can be difficult to interpret, symptoms that can be wide-ranging and people's insatiable need to find explanations for whatever ails them, foods are frequently blamed for crimes they did not commit.

Though allergies or intolerances (and recognition of them) do appear to be on the rise, there are far more people who erroneously think they have problems with specific foods.

"Every study has shown that the perception of having a food allergy is more often wrong than right," says Robert Wood, a pediatric allergist at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore. "Only about 25% of people who think they have a food allergy will actually have one."

Many reactions

Between 6% and 8% of children under 3 are known to be allergic to at least one food. By adulthood, the number drops to about 3% or 4%, or about 12 million people in the U.S. Milk, eggs, peanuts, wheat, soy, fish, shellfish and tree nuts account for 90% of food allergies.

Whether it's to pollen, penicillin, bees or strawberries, an allergic reaction involves an antibody called IgE (Immunoglobulin E) that is part of the body's normal attack against substances it senses as foreign.

In people with allergies, IgE triggers the release of histamines and other chemicals that can lead, within minutes to two hours, to a variety of symptoms, including itchy mouth, swollen tongue, hives, wheezing, skin rashes, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. At its worst, the reaction is anaphylaxis -- a potentially life-threatening reaction that can occur within seconds and may lead to shock, airway closure and a blood-pressure drop.

In the case of food, these reactions appear to be happening more often than they used to. Exact comparisons are hard to come by, but some studies show a doubling of peanut allergies in the last five to 10 years in kids in the U.S., United Kingdom and Australia. A Mayo Clinic study published in June reported that celiac disease is now four times more common than it was in the 1950s.

For all food allergies, diagnoses in U.S. kids have increased by 18% in the last decade, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Inaccurate tests

As food allergies become more common, doctors struggle to figure out who actually has them. Testing is part of the problem: Common food allergy tests aren't very accurate.

The only sure-fire way to test for food allergies is with food challenges, in which patients consume controlled and increasing doses of a suspected food under careful supervision.

Yet doctors, especially primary care doctors who aren't allergy specialists, are far more likely to do blood tests, which are much less accurate and more difficult to interpret.

Experts have seen a proliferation of blood testing by primary doctors, a trend that leads to misdiagnoses of food allergies.

"We get patients coming in who are avoiding 20 or 30 foods based on blood tests," says David Fleischer, a pediatric allergist at National Jewish Health in Denver.

In a recent study, Fleischer and colleagues spent two weeks working with 125 children who had been diagnosed with a collective total of 60 food allergies. The kids, whose average age was 4, took a series of food challenges.

At the end of the study, presented in March at an allergy conference, the researchers were able to reintroduce at least four and as many as 20 foods into each child's diet. About 90% of the suspected allergies had turned up negative.

"People are so happy and appreciative when they can get more foods in," Fleischer says. "Even just one food allergy changes your life."

Celiac disease

There is no doubt that food allergies are real, serious and dangerous. At the same time, there is a long history of paranoia about food that lies more in the mind than the stomach.

In a 1987 study that followed nearly 500 children from birth to age 3, 28% of parents and caregivers thought their babies had adverse food reactions, though only 8% ended up having confirmed allergies.

Not much has changed. Today, between one-quarter and one-third of people suspect an allergy in their children or themselves, even though rates are up to five times lower than that.

For some people, the problem is not an allergy but a more subtle sensitivity or intolerance. Lactose intolerance, for example, occurs when there's a shortage of the enzyme that breaks down milk proteins. About 50 million Americans have it, with symptoms after consuming milk products that include bloating, gas and diarrhea. The solution is simple: Avoid dairy, or supplement the diet with the enzyme lactase.

Gluten sensitivity, which is becoming more common -- in reality and also in people's perceptions -- is more complicated. It occurs when the body fights against gluten, a protein in wheat, barley and rye. At its worst, this sets off a cycle in which the body's immune system gets confused and attacks the small intestine. The result is celiac disease.

About one out of 133 people in the U.S. has celiac disease, though an estimated 90% of cases are currently undiagnosed. And rates are increasing. As many as 2.5% of the population will have celiac disease in a decade, predicts Daniel Leffler, a gastroenterologist at Harvard Medical School in Boston.

The good news is that celiac disease can be diagnosed with a blood test and intestinal biopsy. The bad news is that a large number of people don't have celiac disease and yet still feel lousy after eating gluten. Symptoms can be as vague as fatigue and stomach upset, possibly because gluten is a protein that is hard for everyone to digest. But there is no definitive intolerance test.

In that way, sensitivities to gluten resemble sensitivities to MSG, food dyes and nitrites. Some people insist they feel better without these chemicals in their diets. But scientists can't say for sure if they're right -- or whether what they're reporting is some kind of self-administered placebo effect. There are no data to help clear up the muddle.

"With most intolerances, there's nothing medically you can measure," Leffler says. "There's nothing you can see."

It's a natural human tendency to link ill feelings with whatever you ate last, says Marion Nestle, professor of nutrition, food studies and public health at New York University.

"It makes you feel better to know you've got something real," Nestle says. "It's awful to just feel awful."

'Huge headache'

It can't hurt to try a diet free of gluten, food dyes or MSG, experts say. The danger is when people eliminate one food after another in an attempt to get rid of symptoms that (perhaps coincidentally) wax and wane with those dietary changes.

Highly restrictive diets can be tough on people and their families. (There is food coloring even in some cheeses, and gluten in soy sauce.) They can also be unhealthy. To avoid malnutrition, fatigue or low bone density, doctors recommends people who start removing ingredients from their diets consult a nutritionist for advice.

"There's nothing magical about a gluten-free diet," Leffler says. "It's actually rigorous and difficult to follow. It's in processed meats, medications, dustings on frozen vegetables. It's everywhere. For people who have to follow a gluten-free diet, it's a huge, huge headache."

As scientists work to unravel the mysteries of the immune system, doctors recommend that people with suspected allergies or intolerances get to a specialist right away. It takes an average of 11 years to get diagnosed for celiac disease. No one should have to wait that long to feel better.

Monday, July 13, 2009

Jamie Oliver reforms see pupils reject school food


Nicola Woolcock, Times of London
July 9, 2009

The number of children having school meals has stalled after the increase in nutritional standards pioneered by Jamie Oliver, official figures show today.

Only a third of secondary age pupils eat a cooked lunch.

Participation has decreased ever since the standard of food rose after Oliver’s School Dinners campaign in 2005 which resulted in the banning of Turkey Twizzlers and daily helpings of chips.

The School Food Trust, a government agency responsible for improving the quality and take-up of school meals, claimed a victory because the figures rose marginally when comparing schools that had used exactly the same method of calculation last year.

But the figures are an embarrassment for the Government, which pledged three years ago to achieve an increase of 10 percentage points in the number of children eating school meals, by this autumn — a target that has been missed whichever set of data is used.

The School Food Trust claimed this year’s was the first “statistically robust national survey” of school meal take-up, but did not say in previous years that the figures were unreliable.

When comparing schools that had collected the figures in the same way year-on-year, it said the number of children eating school meals had risen by 0.1 per cent, from 43.8 per cent to 43.9 per cent at primary level, and from 35.5 per cent to 36 per cent in secondary schools.

But figures from all local authorities that responded show the overall national figures were 39.3 per cent in primary schools, compared with 43.6 per cent last year, and 35.1 per cent at secondary level, compared with 37.2 per cent in 2008. The School Food Trust said that this year's figures had been collected in a different way, so that the years could not be compared.

The Local Authority Caterers’ Association(LACA) described the increase as “marginal”. Neil Porter, its chairman, said: “We recognise that this year we are using a different way to calculate the data on the take-up of school lunches. LACA is encouraged by the apparent marginal upward trend in meal take-up in both primary and secondary schools.

“However, we believe that we are on a longer journey when it comes to secondary school students. Increasing secondary meal take-up will continue to be a challenge for all of us.”

It was at a secondary school in South Yorkshire that mothers of pupils took orders from the local fast food shop for pupils at lunchtime, after children refused to eat the new healthy school meals. They were seen pushing burgers, fish and chips through the school gates.

David Laws, the Liberal Democrat Shadow Schools Secretary, said the figures showed a “massive drop” in the number of children eating school meals, and had missed its target to increase participation by “well over one million children”.

He added: “We now know that barely a third of secondary school pupils are eating school meals.

“There are a number of reasons why the Government has missed its target — including the rushed introduction of new food standards before the groundwork had been done to ensure children will eat the new healthier option.

“The Government stands little chance in meeting its targets unless there is both more investment in the school meals service and a massive change in expectations, so that sitting down for a proper lunch once again becomes the norm for every child.”

Prue Leith, chairwoman of the School Food Trust, said: “We now have a genuine picture of take-up across the country and we can see that real progress is being made the length and breadth of England.

“I am heartened that take-up has increased slightly in primary schools following the introduction of new nutrient-based standards and am convinced we are winning the battle for the hearts, minds and tastebuds of children and parents.

“It is particularly pleasing that secondary schools have turned the corner. This has always been a long-term project.”

Diana Johnson, the Schools Minister, said: “Four years ago, the majority of children were eating unhealthy meals at school. Chips, chocolate and sugar-filled fizzy drinks were available everyday as a choice for school lunch. Today there is no school where this can now happen — all schools must provide a portion of vegetable and fruit as part of a nutritionally balanced main meal. Now millions of children across the country are eating healthy school lunches.

“We know that it is often the state of dining facilities and poor organisation, not nutritional changes that put children off schools dinners. That is why we have invested significant funds in improving dining facilities and the School Food Trust is supporting schools to improve the way they organise their meals services.”

Sunday, July 12, 2009

Week Five: Cheese Course


Ina Garten-inspired Cheese Platter by Ezra Pound Cake

M 7.13
Read: “Sorry Fugu” by T.C. Boyle from T.C. Boyle Stories and “Taste” by Roald Dahl from The Best of Roald Dahl
Class: Story discussion; Presentations

T 7.14
Read: “Last Requests” by Giles Smith's from Speaking With the Angel and “When Mr. Pirzada Came to Dine” from The Interpreter of Maladies by Jhumpa Lahiri
Class: Story discussion; Presentations

W 7.15
Class: Literature analysis essay; Story discussion

Th 7.16
Class: Writer’s Workshop, Presentations
Journal 4 Assignment: Your final journal is about the sometimes adventurous nature of food. For this assignment, you must either try a food you have never eaten before or previously decided you did not like. This may be either an individual food (e.g. cucumbers, plantains) or a dish (e.g. liver and onions, Coq au vin). When doing so, think about the experience of eating this food. If its new to you, how would you describe the taste, texture, consistency, etc? Why have you never had it before? If its a food you have decided you do not like, does eating it again confirm your earlier decision?Is it better now that before, why or why not?
Due: First three pages of your research paper (bring three copies); Journal 5
Catering: Group 5—Cheese Course

UPCOMING:
Week 6: Dessert Course
Note: Three day weekNo class Thursday
M 7.20
Class: Writer’s Workshop, Presentations
Due: Research paper (first draft; bring three copies)

T 7.21
Class: Watch—Eat Drink Man Woman (1994)

W 7.22
Class: Course review, Evaluations
Due: Research Paper
Catering: Group 6—Dessert Course

Thursday, July 9, 2009

Newsom's Fresh Idea: Mandates on Healthier Food



By Heather Knight, San Francisco Chronicle
Thursday, July 9, 2009

(07-08) 20:10 PDT -- He's already banned spending city money to buy bottled water and mandated composting citywide. Now, San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom is taking on something as basic as water and trash: food.

Newsom on Wednesday issued an executive directive he hopes will dramatically change how San Franciscans eat.

All city departments have six months to conduct an audit of unused land - including empty lots, rooftops, windowsills and median strips - that could be turned into community gardens or farms that could benefit residents, either by working at them or purchasing the fresh produce. Food vendors that contract with the city must offer healthy and sustainable food. All vending machines on city property must also offer healthy options, and farmers' markets must begin accepting food stamps, although some already do.

The mayor will send an ordinance to the Board of Supervisors within two months mandating that all food served in city jails, hospitals, homeless shelters and community centers be healthy.

And effective immediately, no more runs to the doughnut shop before meetings and conferences held by city workers. Instead, city employees must use guidelines created by the Health Department when ordering food for meetings.

Examples include cutting bagels into halves or quarters so people can take smaller portions and serving vegetables instead of potato chips.

"We have an eating and drinking problem in the United States of America," Newsom said Wednesday. "It's impacting our health, and it's impacting our economy."

The directives are the product of an "urban-rural roundtable" of food experts from around California convened by Newsom last year. The group was charged with finding ways to get more of the food grown on farms within 200 miles of San Francisco onto the plates of city residents, especially those who depend on government meals.

The idea is to decrease the need to import food, reconnect people to homegrown food rather than processed food, and to provide more options in neighborhoods like Bayview-Hunters Point that lack easy access to grocery stores.

Plan still lacks details

Many of the details have yet to be worked out, including how much it will cost. Newsom bristled when asked how it would be funded because there's no money to implement the food policy in the budget agreed to by the mayor and the board's budget committee just last week.

"We have plenty of resources," he said. "This is not a budget buster."

Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, a member of the budget committee, said he likes the idea - and in fact, supervisors have been calling for the creation of an urban farm in San Francisco for years. He said that he wanted one included in the redevelopment of the former UC Berkeley Extension site on Laguna Street, but that the idea was never embraced by the mayor's administration.

"Even if it's a good idea, the timing's a little odd," Mirkarimi said of the unfunded proposal coming just days after the budget compromise. "I like the notion if we're able to get this at a very low cost."

It's also unclear how much land could be converted into community farms. The Public Utilities Commission has thousands of acres outside San Francisco that could be used, and the Real Estate Division and the Recreation and Park Department own some unused parcels in the city.

Model farm in Oakland

Newsom made the announcement Wednesday at a junkyard-turned-farm in West Oakland that could serve as a model for how land could be converted in San Francisco. A stone's throw from BART, it used to be home to old cars and one angry dog, but now is run by the nonprofit City Slicker Farms.

With a handful of staff members and scores of volunteers from the neighborhood, the nonprofit operates six small farms in West Oakland and sells the produce, along with honey and eggs, on a sliding scale to local residents at a Saturday farm stand.

The 2,000-square-foot former junkyard now produces 2,000 pounds of food every year, including lettuce, squash, tomatoes, parsley, sage, collard greens, grapes, cherries and plums.

"This speaks to people's soul," said Barbara Finnin, director of City Slicker Farms. "It's a place people can relax, be outside, and nourish themselves and their families."

Newsom toured the farm, biting off a piece of kale to taste, munching on an apricot and admiring sunflowers taller than him.

Back in San Francisco, it was apparent Newsom's idea may take some getting used to. Michael Summers, who operates a hot dog stand in Civic Center Plaza that contracts with the city, said the dogs made of tofu don't sell nearly as well as the old-fashioned meat kind. That was evidenced by the line of people ordering hot dogs just after noon - and not a tofu order among them.

New food rules

San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom is calling for city-funded food to be healthy and sustainable. His administration provided the following directives for what this means:

Safe and healthy: Avoids excessive pesticide use and has high nutritional value.

Culturally acceptable: Acceptable culturally and religiously to San Francisco's diverse population. An example would be providing Chinese seniors with bok choy and other vegetables they're familiar with at local farmers' markets.

Sustainable: Grown in a way that maintains the health of agricultural lands and advances self-sufficiency among farmers and farmworkers. An example would be using manure as a fertilizer rather than chemicals.

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

Fast-food Fries Without Trans Fats Rated Just as Good



By J.M. Hirsch, Associated Press
07/06/2009 03:09:13 PM PDT

Did fast-food fries go downhill when trans fats went away? No, says Consumer Reports.

Now that most major fast-food chains have purged trans fats from their menus, the magazine tested the french fries at Wendy's, McDonald's and Burger King — and found they taste about the same as they used to.

For its August issue, the magazine had taste testers sample fries from three outlets of each chain. The same testers previously had sampled the fries when trans fats were used.

The fries at Wendy's came out on top with a rating of "very good"; they were described as having a big potato flavor with a light crispy surface and a soft inside.

The fries at McDonald's, also rated very good, were praised as flavorful and crisp but needed to taste "more potato-y." Burger King's fries came last with a "good" rating. The magazine said they were tough and tasted more of oil than potato.

The Burger King fries contained the most fat and calories: 23 grams of fat and 480 calories for a medium order, compared with Wendy's 20 grams of fat, 430 calories and McDonald's at 19 grams of fat, 380 calories.

Trans fat raises the level of bad cholesterol in the body and can increase the risk of coronary heart disease.

California last year passed a law saying trans fat must be removed from restaurant products beginning in 2010 and from all non-packaged retail baked goods by 2011. Lawmakers nationwide are considering similar laws.

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

Entree of the Week: Balsamic Barbecue Chicken from Giada De Laurentiis

Daily Caffeine Dose May Delay Progress of Alzheimer’s, Researchers Say



By Hannah Devlin, The Times of London
July 6, 2009

Three large cups of coffee a day could help to slow the progress of Alzheimer’s disease and even reverse the condition, researchers say.

A daily dose of caffeine can suppress the degenerative processes in the brain that can lead to confusion and memory loss, a study in mice suggests.

Although drinking coffee has previously been linked to a lower risk of developing Alzheimer’s, this is the first study to suggest that caffeine can directly target the disease itself.

Alzheimer’s occurs when sticky clumps of abnormal protein in the brain called beta-amyloid build up to form plaques, impairing cognitive function. But mice with a rodent equivalent of the disease showed a 50 per cent reduction in levels of amyloid protein in their brains after scientists spiked their drinking water with caffeine.

The change was reflected in their behaviour as they developed better memories and quicker thinking. In the study, published today in the Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, researchers from the University of South Florida studied 55 mice that had been genetically engineered to develop dementia symptoms identical to those of Alzheimer’s as they aged. Before treatment the mice, which were aged 18 to 19 months — about 70 years in human terms — had performed poorly in the memory tests.

Half the animals were given a daily dose of caffeine in their drinking water — equivalent to a human consuming about six espresso shots or 500mg of pure caffeine — while the other half continued to drink ordinary water. By the end of the two-month study, the caffeine-drinking mice were performing far better on tests of memory and thinking than mice given water. Their memories were as sharp as those of healthy older mice without dementia.

The scientists found that when the mice drank caffeinated water their blood levels of beta amyloid protein fell quickly. More importantly, the same effect occurred in the brain. Almost half the abnormal protein previously seen when the brains of Alzheimer’s mice were examined had vanished after two months.

The researchers hope that caffeine could present a safe, inexpensive treatment for dementia.

Professor Gary Arendash, a memory and ageing specialist who led the latest research, said that he wished to conduct human patient trials as soon as possible.

“The findings provide evidence that caffeine could be a viable treatment for established Alzheimer’s disease and not simply a protective strategy,” he said.

A study in 2002 found that people who consumed caffeine in mid-life were 60 per cent less likely to develop the disease.

About 417,000 people in the UK suffer from Alzheimer’s, and numbers are steadily rising. There is currently no cure and although drugs can help stabilise the condition, they are not widely available on the NHS until patients have advanced-stage disease and their effectiveness is relatively unpredictable from person to person.

Taking 500mg of caffeine in tablet form would be safe for most patients and would have relatively few side-effects, Professor Arendash said, although it is not clear how the dosage would translate from mice to humans.

Rebecca Wood, chief executive of the Alzheimer’s Research Trust, said that it was too early to say whether coffee or caffeine supplements could help Alzheimer’s patients.

“With no cure yet, research into treatments that could help people with Alzheimer’s is vital. [But] we need to do more research to find out whether this effect will be seen in people,” she said.

Getting perked up

How to get 500mg of caffeine a day:

2 x 250mg caffeine pills

3 x large espresso-based coffees

6 x cans of Red Bull

14 x cans of Coca-Cola

15 x cups of tea

7kg (16 lb) of chocolate

Source: US Food and Drug Administration, University of South Florida

Sunday, July 5, 2009

Week Four: Main Course


Okinawan-style Braised Beef Short Ribswith Maple Syrup Glaze from Food & Love

M 7.6
Read: KC, pg. 204-302
Class: Book discussion

T 7.7
Read: BFW—“Waiting for Asparagus” by Barbra Kingsolver, pg. 2-9; “Local Heroes?” by Barry Estabrook, pg. 10-13; “Feast of Burden” by Sara Deseren, pg. 43-49; “Organicize Me” by Michael A. Stusser, pg. 50-62
Class: Essay discussion; Presentations: Amanda J. (La Tomatina), Clark Worthington (Made in California: In-N-Out Burger, Wahoo's Fish Taco, and Jamba Juice), Maret J. (Regional American Street Foods); Watch—"Binge Drinking Mom" from 30 Days; Lecture—“The Art of Persuasion: Logos, Pathos, and Ethos”

W 7.8
Read: BFW—“The Age of Casseroles” by Irene Sax, pg. 90-95; “Don’t Call It a Hot Dog” by Joe Yonan, pg. 178-181; “In Search of the Transcendent Taqueria” by Bill Addison, pg. 183-190; “Las Fabulosas Taco Trucks” by Robb Walsh, pg. 193-202
Class: Essay discussion; Presentations: Susan C. (Food Wastage), Dominika P. (Environmentally-friendly Foods), Jonathan P. (Eating Disorders)

Th 7.9
Class: Comparative analysis essay; Essay discussion
Journal 4 Assignment: Britain's Jamie Oliver is what is often referred as a "celebrity chef," a chef whose personal popularity exceeds that of their cooking. In fact, many chefs today, including Bobby Flay, Emeril Lagasse, and Tyler Florence, are known more for their TV shows, cookware lines, and restaurants, than their contributions to cooking. Using "Up Close: Jamie Oliver" from TVNewZealand (eR) as a basis, consider what the impact of these chefs is. Do they ultimately promote good cooking, or is it more often about fame? Is cooking better or worse off with celebrity chefs?
Due: Journal 4
Catering: Group 4—Main Course

Still King: Chestnut Chomps 68 Franks to Win Third Nathan's Title


By Lia Calabro, Special to SI.com


NEW YORK -- Sixty-eight hot dogs. Ten minutes. Zero vomit. Another hot dog eating world record was broken this Fourth of July by the world's leading gurgitator, Joey Chestnut. The three-time Nathan's Famous Hot Dog Eating champion hunched away from the competition with an engorged stomach, a green face, $20,000 and the coveted Mustard Yellow Belt in hand. Apparently hot dog glory really is worth extreme gastric agony.

American fan-favorite Chestnut out-ate his arch rival Takeru Kobayashi 68 franks to 64. There was no dramatic tie on Coney Island this year, no five hot dog eat-off overtime like there was in 2008. Chestnut had took lead right away. He leapt out of the gate, inhaling dog after dog by using methodic chomps and paced swallows- three huge bites could throw one back and keep it down. He had the meat sweats. There were chewed chunks of hot dog on his face and white shirt. But he achieved his goal. He beat the 12 minute hot dog eating world record - 59 - in 10 minutes. As one Chestnut fan shouted out during the competition, "Joey means it, man."

"It wasn't pretty, but I got 'em down," Chestnut boasted after the competition.

From creative nicknames to gluttonous (but somehow remarkably thin) competitors, circus acts to music acts, the corner of Surf and Stillwell Avenues was more of a spectacle than any firework display this season. Food groupies lined up in the thousands to see their beloved eating champions compete. Chestnut fans chanted "USA" at Kobayashi supporters until finally the Japanese prodigy fell to the mercy of Chestnut.

Kobayashi didn't have a quick start. He couldn't maintain a steady pace. He couldn't take back Mustard Yellow Belt from Chestnut, but he still beat the world record of 59 hot dogs by devouring and digesting 64, for the most part.

At one point the ex-champ almost suffered a reversal-- a reversal is eater's slang for throwing up. Fortunately, Kobayashi managed to catch his up-chuck in his hand and shove it back into its rightful place before being disqualified. Vomiting is to professional eating as steroids are to professional baseball-- it is just not acceptable.

The Japanese six-time world champion reigned from 2001 until 2006, but was de-throned by Chestnut in 2007. Kobayashi, 31, blames the 2007 loss on a jaw injury he incurred before Nathan's competition. "Jawthritis," however, could not explain Kobayashi's 2009 loss. He defeated Chestnut in the Pizza Hut P-Zone Chow-Lenge in May 2009. Kobayashi could win, but just not on this Fourth of July at Nathan's 94th annual Hot Dog Eating Contest.

Patrick "Deep Dish" Bertoletti fought an impressive battle, coming in third place with 55 hot dogs eaten. And Sonya "The Black Widow" Thomas beat the women's hot dog eating world record by devouring 41 of Nathan's finest.

Thursday, July 2, 2009

Turf War at the Hot Dog Cart



By Julia Moskin, New York Times

MONDAY was a routine day for Grant Di Mille and Samira Mahboubian, the owners of the Street Sweets food truck, a mobile trove of croissants, cupcakes and cookies that got rolling last month.

The couple loaded the truck by 6 a.m., parked in front of the Museum of Modern Art at 7, traded hostilities with other vendors from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m., and were surrounded by police officers by 2.

“The police told these guys that nobody owns the streets. But it sure doesn’t feel that way,” said Mr. Di Mille, who called the Midtown North precinct — not for the first time — when a jewelry vendor set up shop directly in front of his sales window.

In four weeks of business, the couple has been threatened at the depot where they park the truck; cursed by a gyro vendor who said that he would set their truck on fire; told to stay off every corner in Midtown by ice cream truck drivers; and approached by countless others with advice — both friendly and menacing — on how to get along on the streets.

“I want to be a good neighbor,” Mr. Di Mille said. “But I am nobody’s fool, and nobody’s pushover, and I should not have to carry a baseball bat on my truck in order to sell cupcakes.”

In the last two years, upscale food trucks have swarmed the streets, entrancing New Yorkers with everything from artisanal Earl Grey ice cream to vegan tacos. These highly visible trucks, their outspoken owners and their followers on Twitter, Facebook and food blogs, have broken the code of the streets that has long kept a relative peace among food vendors.

Turf wars are nothing new for carts selling kebabs and cheap coffee. But the makers of thumbprint cookies, chicken-Thai basil dumplings, and crème anglaise are not happy about the sharp elbows that are part of the city’s sidewalk economy, or the murky bureaucracy that oversees the issuing of permits. (Six people were arrested on Tuesday on fraud charges related to food vending permits.)

These new culinary entrepreneurs, most of them with English as their first language and little fear of police or immigration authorities, say that they are on a mission to bring better street food to New Yorkers, and ready to bring dark corners of the business to light.

“Right now the system actually favors the black market over people who want to do things right,” said Nathalie Jordi, an owner of People’s Pops, who makes frozen treats with ingredients like locally grown rhubarb and strawberries. “How can that be good for the city?”

Now, having been through the hassle of getting established on the street, these vendors are determined to find gold there. Like Mr. Di Mille, who has two children to support and a six-figure investment to recoup, they say they can’t afford to give in to the vendors who want them to move.

“If I only did business where these hot dog guys said I could do business,” said Lev Ekster, owner of the new CupcakeStop truck, “I would be vending in New Jersey.”

The established vendors, on the other hand, see newcomers as competitors with an unfair advantage in a desperate economy. “They think they can come in with their big fancy truck and push into a spot where I’ve been for 18 years,” said Norman Sweeney, the jewelry vendor who tried to block the Street Sweets truck Monday. He said that the strain of holding down two jobs and sleeping in his truck had caused him to “snap.” “This spot is all I have left,” he said.

Since last fall, when the city’s economy turned especially rough, the trickle of new trucks has become a flood. “We used to get two or three calls a week from people wanting to become food vendors,” said Michael Wells, a director of the Street Vendor Project, a nonprofit group that advocates for vendors. “Now we get a dozen.”

More variety and better street food for the people of New York might seem like an uncontroversial proposition. But new food trucks have encountered resistance from brick-and-mortar businesses; huge backlogs in the city’s licensing system; and harassment from established vendors, which, new vendors say, is increasing as the trucks attract more attention.

“Absolutely the situation has deteriorated since last fall,” said Kenny Lao, an owner of the Rickshaw Dumpling Truck, who says that his life was threatened by other vendors when the truck opened for business last year. “The old vendors are edgy, and they don’t bother to figure out which one of the new trucks is which,” he said.

“A new vendor used to mean someone’s cousin coming in from Egypt,” said Zach Brooks, whose blog Midtown Lunch chronicles the sidewalk-food scene. “Now it’s a major culture clash.”

The early summer has brought at least a dozen new trucks, many of them run by people with advanced degrees and white-collar backgrounds: CupcakeStop is owned by a 2009 New York University Law School graduate. Cravings, a Taiwanese food truck, is the brainchild of Thomas Yang, who developed the truck’s business model before graduating from Baruch College in 2008. The owners of Street Sweets both left six-figure jobs to build their business, and the Big Gay Ice Cream Truck is driven by Doug Quint, a doctoral candidate in bassoon performance at CUNY. “The whole Brooklyn Philharmonic season was canceled,” he said. “I have to get through the summer somehow.”

The new truckers, knowingly or innocently, often roll right over unwritten rules about which corner belongs to whom, and when. The city, other than blocking certain streets entirely and enforcing parking regulations, does not dictate locations for food carts. But spots are virtually owned by vendors who have worked them for decades; they are handed down within families and even sold on the black market.

“You can set your watch by it: park in a new spot, and within 15 minutes someone will come and check you out,” said Kim Ima, a former actress who owns the Treats Truck. Ms. Ima, one of the first upscale mobile vendors, had the tires of her truck slashed near her bakery soon after opening in 2007. “The street is like the playground when you’re a kid, and you have to learn your way around,” she said. “You have to learn where the sixth graders sit and where the dodgeball game is before you can safely sit and eat your lunch.”

Vendors say that the traditional code of the streets may be effective, but that it feeds on fear, intimidation and the city’s lack of enforcement of permit rules.

“It only works because everyone is a little bit in the wrong, and no one is 100 percent clean,” said Mr. Lao. “We can’t go through legal channels to resolve our disputes.” Mr. Lao was referring to the notorious black market in the food vendor permits issued by the city’s Department of Health. Most of the vendors interviewed would not talk publicly about the status of their permits. But several of them, asking not to be identified because of the dubious legality of the arrangements, said they had secured theirs by paying unauthorized “fixers” or by entering into partnerships with existing permit holders. A common form of retribution among vendors is to report one another to city authorities for permit violations.

The black market, vendors say, is nourished by the city’s bureaucracy. Many, especially those for whom English is not a first language, pay brokers to navigate the system. These illegal go-betweens are common in the central depots where food vendors are required by the Health Department to park their carts and trucks.

Of all the gray areas for food vendors — who are regulated by a cluster of agencies including the Department of Consumer Affairs, the Police Department and the New York State sales tax authority — permits are the murkiest. The Health Department set the number of full-time food vending permits at 3,100, in 1979. (In the fall, the City Council will vote on a proposal that would increase the number of permits to 25,000.)

The $200 permits are valid for two years and can be renewed indefinitely by mail. Their black-market value is tremendous: up to $15,000 for two years, according to a report released Tuesday by the city’s Department of Investigation. The new vendors are openly questioning the black holes of the system. “Every day, the city is leaving thousands of dollars on the table” by not taking control of the illegal trade in permits, said Mr. Yang, of the Cravings truck.

Ben van Leeuwen, whose artisanal ice cream business has expanded from one to three trucks in the last year, said that the city’s revenue from the food vendor business was “laughable” compared with the potential earnings. “I could pay as much as $5,000 a month for the summer season and still have a workable business model,” he said.

Many vendors believe that vastly increasing the number of permits, and selling a percentage annually at auction, would work. Others believe that strict limits are necessary to pacify the owners of the city’s thousands of delis, bakeries, restaurants and food stores.

“High-visibility trucks seem like a good thing, but there might not be room for everyone,” said Thomas DeGeest, owner of the Wafels & Dinges Belgian waffle truck, who left a spot on Hudson Street downtown on June 10 after being warned off by a building employee. “I can see the pushback from the brick-and-mortars coming a mile away.”

Mr. Ekster said he encountered resistance even before his CupcakeStop truck hit the streets in June. He said he received a phone call from the publicist for the popular Crumbs Bake Shop chain pointing out that the spot where he planned to park, near the Crumbs on University Place, was illegal. (Through a spokeswoman, Jason Bauer, the bakery’s chief executive officer, said that he was providing friendly advice to a fellow baker.)

“These bakeries should focus on making better cupcakes, and not on stamping out the competition,” said Mr. Ekster, who, like many vendors, loudly proclaims his belief in free-market food fights.

Mr. Ekster said that before starting out in June, he wrongly believed that other street vendors would not see his fancy cupcakes as competition, but that was not the case. “When a hot dog guy sees a line in front of my truck, he thinks: ‘That’s my line,’ ” Mr. Ekster said.

The notion of a tiered market for street food does not ring true to some established vendors. “If someone comes out of the building with $5 to spend, he is going to choose between my truck and another one,” said Atif Qureishi, a vendor of halal lamb in Midtown.

Others have begun to see the new vendors as inevitable, and possibly lucrative. “It brings more people out on the street,” said Lotfi Mouchrak, who was working on the Steak Truck on Park Avenue last Thursday when a new truck serving burgers made from grass-fed beef parked one block away. “Different food for different people.”

The troubles for Street Sweets began when diners sitting outside at Bistro Milano on West 55th Street left the restaurant, complaining of the truck’s noise. A few days later, the management of 1350 Sixth Avenue, a glossy high rise that is the landlord for Bistro Milano, called officials to pressure the couple into moving on for good. Soon the truck was surrounded by police officers, firefighters and a hazmat squad.

For Mr. Di Mille, who until recently was a graphic designer earning about $200,000 a year, being treated like a vagrant was unsettling. “For 20-odd years, I was the kind of person who put on a tie and ate lunch in restaurants like that every day, and now I’m being shooed away from the curb like a low life-form,” he said. “I would not in my wildest dreams have thought it would be like this.”

After the truck’s showdown with the authorities was reported on the Midtown Lunch blog, the restaurant received angry phone calls from readers. “Everybody loves the truck, but we are also a small business, with 20 families depending on us for their jobs,” said Enrico Migliaccio, a manager of the restaurant. “Because we are not a truck, we are nothing?”

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Certain Foods Symbolize American Cuisine


By Bill Daley, Chicago Tribune

July 1, 2009

The debate about American food has been swirling for decades. It will likely continue almost as long. Still, people keep trying to nail down an answer, often zeroing in on a specific food.

--Karen Resta, a Virginia-based writer and blogger, went all out. She listed some 40 iconic American foods, from shad bakes to soft-serve ice cream, as a way of providing a definition, but then got fed up. "This is ridiculous," she wrote on Facebook. "There's no end to this question. I have to say two more things: fluffernutter and Larry Forgione (the restaurateur behind An American Place restaurant in St. Louis -- the legendary Manhattan original has closed -- and the so-called "godfather of American cuisine"). Really. Why always Alice Waters (of California's Chez Panisse) and no Larry Forgione?"

--Molly O'Neill, editor of "American Food Writing: An Anthology with Classic Recipes," told a crowd at the Printers Row Lit Fest last month that the American food icon is fried chicken. She explained: "Because it goes across class lines, regional lines and cultural and ethnic lines. The idea of fried chicken was spread by churches. It's a great equalizer."

--Clark Wolf, the guru of hot food trends, cheese expert and author, described the American appetite this way: "We love the whole food, the whole chicken kind of thing, while when it comes to beef we want it sliced and we want steak. American food seems like Western European food meeting Japanese simplicity."

--Roy Finamore, a cookbook editor and author, said his mind goes straight to "the juicy cheeseburger that drips down your arms when you eat it," especially when "American" is coupled with "4th of July." He added: "No matter what part of the country you're from, baked bean and potato salad are American. ... And so's apple pie."

Finamore thinks the term "American cuisine" suggests an agreed-to conformity that American fare doesn't quite have.

"American cooking is in flux all of the time," he said. "We're still adapting."

Sunday, June 28, 2009

Week Three: Soup Course


Butternut and Sweet Potato Soup from Nigella Lawson

M 6.29
Read: OD, pg. 364-411
Class:Book Discussion; Presentations: Lan C. (History of Tofu), Vincent C. (How Cheese is Made), Kimberly H. (Worst Drinks in America)

T 6.30
Read: KC, pg. 3-63
Class: Writer’s Workshop, Book discussion; Presentations: Stephanie K. (Ramen), Marius L. (Malnutrition), Johnny R. (Energy Drinks), Glenn H. (Starbucks)
Due: Nonfiction analysis essay (draft 1; bring three copies)

W 7.1
Read: KC, pg. 64-127
Class: Book discussion; Presentations: Solomon A. (Mediterranean Desserts), Kris K. (American Meat Industry)

Th 7.2
Read: KC, pg. 128-203
Class: Book discussion; Presentations: Chelsea Y. (Slow Food Movement), Ai T. (Vietnamese Cuisine), Justin A. (Caribbean Cuisine)
Journal 3 Assignment: Often, dishes tell the stories of a family's history better than anything else. Whether it's grandma's cookie recipe or the Thanksgiving dinner tradition no one can remember having started, food plays integral a role in defining who we are as families. Using This American Life's episode entitled "You Gonna Eat That?" (eR; choose "Full Episode" to hear) as a basis, write about a significant food-related family experience or tradition.
Due: Nonfiction analysis essay (final draft); Journal 3
Catering: Group 3—Soup Course

Assignment: Nonfiction Analysis Essay



Prompt:
Michael Pollan's The Omnivore's Dilemma examines the ways in which we have become disconnected with the foods we eat. In fact, it is a dizzying illustration of the journeys plants and animals take their way to our dinner tables. Still, reading Pollan's book can be an overwhelming experience, one in which readers invariably examine their own eating habits—for better or worse.

In a concise essay, highlight three practices offered by Pollan which consumers can adopt to help both themselves and the environment. Use specific examples from the book to support your thesis.

Requirements:
  • MLA format, including parenthetical citation
  • 2.5-page minimum

Due: Tuesday—Draft 1 (bring three copies); Thursday—Final draft

Friday, June 26, 2009

Thirteen Things Your Waiter Won't Tell You


Waiters share insider secrets about restaurants -- from tipping to what days to avoid dining out.

From Reader's Digest, on Tue Jun 23, 2009 10:24am PDT

1. Avoid eating out on holidays and Saturday nights. The sheer volume of customers guarantees that most kitchens will be pushed beyond their ability to produce a high-quality dish.

2. There are almost never any sick days in the restaurant business. A busboy with a kid to support isn't going to stay home and miss out on $100 because he's got strep throat. And these are the people handling your food.

3. When customers' dissatisfaction devolves into personal attacks, adulterating food or drink is a convenient way for servers to exact covert vengeance. Some waiters can and do spit in people's food.

4. Never say "I'm friends with the owner." Restaurant owners don't have friends. This marks you as a clueless poseur the moment you walk in the door.

5. Treat others as you want to be treated. (Yes, people need to be reminded of this.)

6. Don't snap your fingers to get our attention. Remember, we have shears that cut through bone in the kitchen.

7. Don't order meals that aren't on the menu. You're forcing the chef to cook something he doesn't make on a regular basis. If he makes the same entrée 10,000 times a month, the odds are good that the dish will be a home run every time.

8. Splitting entrées is okay, but don't ask for water, lemon, and sugar so you can make your own lemonade. What's next, grapes so you can press your own wine?

9. If you find a waiter you like, always ask to be seated in his or her section. Tell all your friends so they'll start asking for that server as well. You've just made that waiter look indispensable to the owner. The server will be grateful and take good care of you.

10. If you can't afford to leave a tip, you can't afford to eat in the restaurant. Servers could be giving 20 to 40 percent to the busboys, bartenders, maître d', or hostess.

11. Always examine the check. Sometimes large parties are unaware that a gratuity has been added to the bill, so they tip on top of it. Waiters "faRemove Formatting from selectioncilitate" this error. It's dishonest, it's wrong-and I did it all the time.

12. If you want to hang out, that's fine. But increase the tip to make up for money the server would have made if he or she had had another seating at that table.

13. Never, ever come in 15 minutes before closing time. The cooks are tired and will cook your dinner right away. So while you're chitchatting over salads, your entrées will be languishing under the heat lamp while the dishwasher is spraying industrial-strength, carcinogenic cleaning solvents in their immediate vicinity.

From Waiter Rant: Thanks for the Tip-Confessions of a Cynical Waiter by The Waiter (Ecco/HarperCollins)